[Winona Online Democracy]

I have had a long standing interest in the shares of taxes paid by various
income levels.  I have never seen any compilation of numbers of the tax
burden as a share of income for federal, state and local taxes. Using Google
I was able to find some sources I was not previously aware of which allowed
me to put together the table below.

This table is admittedly a first attempt.  One of the difficulties was that
the sources did not use consistent income brackets which means there is some
estimating involved.  Another is that I could not find FICA/FMHI taxes as a
share of income for the upper two brackets (1%, 5%).  The maximum amount of
income taxable for FICA/FMHI approximates the floor for the top 10% bracket
which means the income share for that level and all below it is 7.5%. For
the top two income brackets  FICA and FMHI were calculated by dividing the
maximum FICA/FMHI tax ($94,000 times 7.5%) by the average income for all the
2002 returns in each bracket. This clearly does not produce a precise
figure, but it is useful as a ball park figure in the absence of anything
else.

Any input on fallacies in methodology would be welcome.  Please be specific
and offer an alternative.

Col 1: Income Group     
Col 2: 2002 Fed Inc Tax As Share of Income (1)  
Col 3: 2002 State/Local Tax as Share of Income (2)      
Col 4: FICA & FMHI Taxes        
Col 5: Total Tax as Share of Income     (Sum of 2, 3 & 4)
Col 6: Income Share (1) & (3)
Col 7: Share of Fed Inc Tax (1)

I wish there were also columns for: Share of State/Local tax and Share of
FICA/FMHI tax.  The picture would then be pretty complete.


Col 1       Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 Col 6 Col 7
Top 1%  27.3    5.5     0.9     33.7    16.0  33.7
Top 5%  23.0    6.5     2.4     31.9    30.6  53.8
Top 20% 17.0    8.0     7.5     32.5    41.8  75.0
Top 50% 14.7    9.5     7.5     31.7    85.8  96.5
Bottom 50%      3.5     10.0    7.5     21.0    13.8   3.5
Bottom 20%      1.5     11.0    7.5     20.0    3.4

Thoughts: The table supports the case that the lower income taxpayers may be
paying too large a share of TOTAL taxes. However, they are already paying
essentially NO federal income taxes. Since we already know Social Security
and Medicare are facing looming funding problems, there is not much room for
reductions there.  Reducing the tax burdens on lower income tax payers will
require cutting state and local taxes. Minnesota could start by further
reducing the property tax on rental property (which is really paid by the
tenant). I think homestead property taxes are already somewhat graduated
based on assessed value.  Is that correct?

I think the case that the top brackets are not paying enough is weak. In
addition, if you study the first source, you learn that as federal income
tax rates for the top brackets have fallen, the share of federal income tax
they pay and the share of their income they pay in taxes have both risen.
This argues for further reductions in the upper income tax brackets until we
find the point at which this trend is reversed (and then we should raise
them slightly).

An equitable tax system would have each share of income paying the same
share of taxes (10% of the income pays 10% of the taxes).  This would be
easiest to manage if all taxes at all levels were income taxes.

Sources:
(1) IRS Statistics of Income, Table 5:  Number of Returns, Shares of AGI and
Total Income Tax, AGI Floor on Percentiles in Current and Constant Dollars,
and Average Tax Rates, 1986-2004
http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/indtaxstats/article/0,,id=129270,00.html
                                        
(2) Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, State and Local Taxes in
2002, All States, As share of Income
http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2879         
                        
(3) U.S. Census Bureau, Alternative Income Estimates in the United States:
2003                                    
http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p60-228.pdf




Glen Schumann
Winona, MN

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 507.454.3056
FAX: 507.454.3056

www.hbci.com/~gschuman



_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to