Thanks Harris.
Sent via BlackBerry from SingTel!
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Harris <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:48:32
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] non-network bits set in '172.16.243.240 mask
255.255.255.0"
On Jan 17, 2012, at 1:41 AM, WeiJie Royce wrote:
> I tired to filter using net 172.16.243.240 mask 255.255.255.0 and it prompt
> me this error. What's happening?
>
> non-network bits set in '172.16.243.240 mask 255.255.255.0"
What's happening is that the network address 172.16.243.240, i.e.
0xAC.0x10.0xF3.0xF0 has bits that are clear in the network mask 255.255.255.0,
i.e. 0xFF.0xFF.0xFF.0x00.
Try
net 172.16.243.0 mask 255.255.255.0
If the netmask truly is 255.255.255.0, a network of 172.16.243.0 is the same as
a network of 172.16.243.1 is the same as a network of 172.16.243.2 ... is the
same as a network of 172.16.243.239 is the same as a network if 172.16.243.240
is the same as a network of 172.16.243.241 .... I.e., the network is really
172.16.243.0.
WinPcap is warning you that the network can't possibly really be 172.16.243.240
if the netmask is 255.255.255.0, as the hosts on that network could have
addresses between 172.16.243.1 and 172.16.243.254. (Libpcap, not surprisingly,
produces the exact same warning, as the code that produces it is exactly the
same.)
_______________________________________________
Winpcap-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
_______________________________________________
Winpcap-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
