To whom it may concern: I apologize sincerely for not being able to answer your question personally, but personal considerations are making it rather difficult for me to answer the many emails that I receive.
If you have any questions -- especially regarding CTCI-WIN -- that can be answered by someone else (e.g. any of Hercules related lists for example), I would like to kindly ask you to PLEASE ask that other person. Please know that I am saving all of your emails (I don't throw any of them away) and hope to eventually answer them all. The only question is when, which I cannot answer at this time. In the mean time, I would like to direct your attention to the Hercules-390 technical support forum on Yahoo, which should be your primary means of Hercules technical support. --------------------------------------- http://www.hercules-390.org [...] "If you have any questions or comments, join the hercules-390 discussion group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-390."; http://www.hercules-390.org/hercsupp.html [...] "Technical Support" "If you have a question about Hercules, please refer to the Hercules Frequently-Asked Questions page first. If your question and/or concern is not addressed in the FAQ, please feel free to post your question to the Hercules-390 forum:" Community email addresses: Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] List owner: [email protected] Files and archives at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-390 "The Hercules-390 forum is in fact your primary source for Hercules support, and you are strongly encouraged to subscribe. We have a vibrant, active community of over 3700+ members, many of which are very knowledgeable in many different areas of mainframe technology, both from a hardware point of view as well as from an operating system and software point of view." "In addition to the main Hercules-390 forum, other more specialized Hercules forums also exist to provide more focused support for a variety of popular IBM mainframe operating systems, such as DOS/VS, VM (VM/370, VM/SP, and VM/ESA), and MVS." --------------------------------------- While I hope to continue being helpful once I am able to get through the personal issues I am currently wrestling with and sincerely wish you the very best in the mean time, I feel it is important to remind you that it is far better to ask your question to an audience of over 6000+ Hercules enthusiasts than it is to one overworked and extremely busy and underpaid developer. Sincerely, -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:winpcap-users- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Boaz Brickner > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 2:34 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Winpcap-users] pcap_fopen_offline() and pcap_close() > Importance: High > > Hi, > > In Pcap.Net (http://pcapdot.net), I'm using pcap_fopen_offline() to open > files. > Since this function assumes the FILE* argument it gets is already open, does > calling pcap_close() on its output also closes that FILE* or do I need to > close it separately. > At first, I thought I need to close it separately, but from some debugging it > seems to me that pcap_fopen_offline() actually takes ownership over the FILE* > so pcap_close() will close it. > > I just want to verify that I understand the behavior correctly. > > Thanks, > > Boaz. _______________________________________________ Winpcap-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
