so we should expect a change in the way we use PacketReceivePacket? The call to this function will remain the same?
ok...I won't bother you with stupid questions andymore and let you go by your work 10x and keep up the good work!! :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fulvio Risso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Denis Bujoreanu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:26 PM Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] I got a Blue Screen of Death on my W2K Server while using WinPcap ver 2.3 > The problem is the the receive process. > > fulvio > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Denis Bujoreanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:06 > > To: Fulvio Risso > > Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] I got a Blue Screen of Death on my W2K > > Server while using WinPcap ver 2.3 > > > > > > 10x F. > > Just one more question: will the changes affect the way > > PacketReceivePacket > > behaves or they will only focus on the write operations? > > > > I'm askin' cause when I went from 2.3 to 3.0a I had a little trouble > > importing the functions exported by the packet.dll library. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Fulvio Risso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:01 PM > > Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] I got a Blue Screen of Death on my W2K Server > > while using WinPcap ver 2.3 > > > > > > > It's a bug of WinPcap 3.0a. > > > We're going to update everything in the next few days. > > > Cheers, > > > > > > fulvio > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Denis Bujoreanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:55 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] I got a Blue Screen of Death on my > > W2K Server > > > while using WinPcap ver 2.3 > > > > > > > > > Ok, I switched to 3.0a, it works well so far. I haven't expereienced > > anymore > > > BSD but I saw that if I take the incoming packet, change > > something in its > > > structure(namely set the RST and FIN flags in the TCP header) > > and write it > > > back, the packet I see as originating from my machine has a different > > length > > > and content. Maybe I'm doing something wrong, I'll keep checking. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Denis Bujoreanu > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:02 PM > > > Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] I got a Blue Screen of Death on my > > W2K Server > > > while using WinPcap ver 2.3 > > > > > > > > > Well I saw that the export section, which interests me the most, of the > > 2.3 > > > version differes from that of the 3.0a - obviously it has some more > > > functions exported, but to my surprise some functions are also > > missing !!! > > > Namely PacketResetAdapter and PacketWaitPacket which kinda renders the > > > backward compatibility null. But still, this doesn't bother me cause I > > don't > > > use the missing functions, what bothers me is that now the > > > PacketGetAdapterNames is different, I mean I get different info from the > > > driver when calling for the adapter names which doesn't scale well in my > > app > > > and I don't quite "get it" why. After all the adapter name > > doesn't change, > > > right? I'll take a closer look at the examples. > > > > > > My card is a plain ethernet (Accton EN2242 100Mbps) which works > > flawlessly > > > with ver 2.3 on capture, but if I try to send packets I get the BSD. > > > > > > I'm using the packet API cause the pcap API is "too simple" and too high > > up > > > in the stack and from the pcap source I saw that what I do in my app is > > the > > > same as pcap does, of course not as efficient but performance > > is not a big > > > concern now, I need functionality first and then speed. One > > other reason I > > > use the packet API is that in order for me to use the pcap API > > I'd have to > > > port a lot of data structures and types. I know there's Lars's > > translation > > > to Delphi for the pcap headers and types but I started using WinPcap > > before > > > I knew about Lars's work and is too much hassle to switch to pcap now, > > > especially since I get what I need from packet API. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Gianluca Varenni > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 04:39 PM > > > Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] I got a Blue Screen of Death on my > > W2K Server > > > while using WinPcap ver 2.3 > > > > > > > > > Well, WinPcap 3.0 is backward compatible with 2.3. > > > I suggested you to wpdpack 3.0a since we have corrected some bugs in the > > > examples, and we have added a brand new HTML documentation and tutorial. > > > > > > Regarding the crashes, on which network adapter are you using winpcap to > > > send packets? Is it ethernet or PPP? Or anything else? > > > > > > GV > > > > > > PS. Why are you using the packet API? We usually suggest users > > to use the > > > pcap API, which we think is much more simple, and yet powerful. > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Denis Bujoreanu > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:12 PM > > > Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] I got a Blue Screen of Death on my > > W2K Server > > > while using WinPcap ver 2.3 > > > > > > > > > well, I don't use the wpcap library (u know... pcap_open_live > > and stuff), > > I > > > use only the functions exported by the packet.dll > > > > > > I have both 2.3 and 3.0a but the packet.dll doesn't seem to > > know about all > > > the functions from ver. 2.3...how come? isn't there a backward > > > compatibility? > > > what do you mean by upgrading the wdpack? I've donwloaded both versions > > > couple of weeks ago... > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Gianluca Varenni > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 04:03 PM > > > Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] I got a Blue Screen of Death on my > > W2K Server > > > while using WinPcap ver 2.3 > > > > > > > > > Try winpcap 3.0alpha (remember to upgrade the developers' pack, too). > > > > > > GV > > > > > > PS. What do you mean by "I use Packet.dll and packet.sys and do not go > > > through the API"? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Denis Bujoreanu > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:18 PM > > > Subject: [WinPcap-users] I got a Blue Screen of Death on my W2K Server > > while > > > using WinPcap ver 2.3 > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I wrote an app that uses WinPacap ver. 2.3 (I use Packet.dll and > > Packet.sys > > > and do not go through the API) to capture packets and if the TCP port > > > matches a certain value than it writes a new packet that closes the > > > connection (it's not a DoS tool, it's ment to be a intrusion prevention > > and > > > access control tool so don't bite my head off yet). Form time to time I > > get > > > a STOP fatal error on my W2K Server, the message error was that the irq > > was > > > less or not equal to...or something like that, it was > > acompanied by a blue > > > screen and a memory dump). I read in a previous post that this > > problem is > > > not a singularity and that it has been fixed. Could it be that > > I am doing > > > something worng (i.e try to write while reading or something like that?) > > > I did take some precautions in my app so I don't step over my > > own toes (a > > > flag that is set when I read and prevents my write to occur) but this > > thing > > > still occured. > > > > ================================================================== This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe use mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe ==================================================================
