Yes, my mistake.
I don't know why I wrote that, since in our internal discussion we said
"yes, that's kernel code but it does nothing".
The fact is that I started the mail on Friday, and I got confused with
'packet32.c'. Then, I finished the main yesterday without reading the
initial part...
Thanks for pointing out this point,
fulvio
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Copeland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 16:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] Announce: WinPcap MP Support
>
>
> > However, the 'packet.c' is user-level code, which is part of
> > the DLL. With SMP, the problems are into the kernel portion
> > of the driver, the .SYS file.
>
> Just for my own clarity, but I thought that packet.c (not packet32.c)
> is part of the driver. It certainly looks like driver code to me,
> and if I compile that directory, the .sys file is created. I
> don't mean to dispute if I'm wrong, just want to make sure.
>
>
>
> ==================================================================
> This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> To unsubscribe use
> mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
> ==================================================================
==================================================================
This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe use
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
==================================================================
