----- Original Message ----- From: "Jens Munk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:19 PM Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] Problems HP computers
> My program is using the Packet API to communicate with some low level > controllers, and when set I just store the selected adapter so the program > automatically starts communicating next time I start it. It's not a big deal > now that I am aware of it, and I have actually been using the version 2.3 > for two years now without a single flaw. Nice job! Why don't to migrate to the pcap API? I know this would be a big change for your code, but the pcap API is more stable, while the packet API is subject to change from time to time (in fact I suppose you had to modify some stuff in your code to work with 3.1 beta, in particular regarding the PacketGetAdapterNames() API). Have a nice day GV > > Thanks, > > Jens. > > > > > Why do you need such information about the prefixes we use for the > adapters? > > We cannot grant not to change that prefix in the future versions (as we do > > not grant not to change the Packet API, as well). > > > > Have a nice day > > GV > > > > > > > > > ================================================================== > This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > To unsubscribe use > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ================================================================== > ================================================================== This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To unsubscribe use mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==================================================================
