Wouldn't have to totally modify Chromium, we'd have to take advantage of NPAPI (ie: search up Chromify-OSD in the Chrome Store). We could bind it to interpret whatever it can from Flash objects (some objects could be linked to RDF data, but I haven't seen it done).
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:34 AM, SII <dante.ash...@thesii.org> wrote: > OK, all of you know we're working on a 'closed' environment to make things > simpler for Wintermute; This means control of functions/applications as well > as versions. > The trouble is, how do we deal with the web? > > I'm not a web dev; so I'm not sure about a lot of things when it comes to > web-browsing for a machine. For instance, Flash objects will be opaque to > Wintermute; it only makes sense to humans. Same with video regardless of > format. > > Perhaps a modified version of Chromium? > > Thoughts/problems/etc? > -- Jacky Alcine Blog <http://jackyalcine.co.cc/> | Launchpad<https://launchpad.net/~jackyalcine>
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~wintermute-devel Post to : wintermute-devel@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~wintermute-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
