We also already done our wireguard deployment via ansible. From my personal point of view AllowedIPs is completly fine - I do not see any missunderstanding.. I would prefer to keep AllowedIPs - especially because our module is done ;)
But yes, it would be good to announce potential option renaming in a bigger style as people already use configuration deployment - Mind the gap! best regards, n3ph On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:26:01PM +0200, Dan Lüdtke wrote: > Any news on the AllowedIPs bikeshedding? What have you decided, Jason? > --> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00068.html > > Asking because I am working on an ansible module Would like to use the most > recent name for the parameter name. > > - Dan > > PS: Good to see so much progress in the go-wireguard repo, Nathan! Thank you > for your effort! > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard -- Please use PGP - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
