Hi David, On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 5:30 PM, David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > You can't require the address to be on the dst device. e.g., it can be an > address from the loopback/vrf device. > > This block needs to be done at function entry, and pass dev as NULL to mean > is the address assigned to any interface. That gets you the equivalency of > the IPv4 check.
I gave v2 my best shot. Hopefully it's adequate, but I have a feeling it might be best for you to just code up what you have in mind. Regards, Jason _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
