PS: This is not urgent or anything. Just wanted to know what your plans are and/or to get an idea how to setup a demo server myself.
I think there are more important things to do right now. > On 16 Nov 2016, at 15:38, Dan Lüdtke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Jason, > >> I guess I could provide IPv6 connectivity, but.... why? It's a demo. > > Because it is a demo of a brand new protocol, showing how it can be used with > legacy versions payload and transport protocol. I find that odd, but as I > understand we have contradicting point of views on IP protocols. > >> If you're using it as an access point to the Internet with intentions >> beyond simply trying out WireGuard, then you're abusing my service. > > I am not using it at all. But it would be useful for howtos and blog posts to > reference it. I don't use vintage IP in my posts, so I can't refer to the > official demo server. > > Since many potential peers are behind NATs using RFC1918 legacy IP addresses > AND have global unicast IP addresses (which are easier to whitelist in a > firewall than maintaining port forwarding in networks using a dynamic > configuration protocol) I expect WireGuard to be especially useful using IPv6 > as transport. > > BTW, I don't see any reason why the demo server should forward to the > Internet at all. Connectivity between peers/server and accessing the hidden > website would be enough for my usecase (howtos/blog posts), which may be a > different one than what you intended when you setup the server. > >> I'm happy to consider this, but I'll need to be convinced that this >> actually matters. > > Unfortunately :) I, for one, need to be convinced why I should create lasting > documentation using an EOL IP protocol. Why does IPv4 matter more than IPv6? > Usually, latency is better when using IPv6. Latency is probably the first > thing demo users test (ping through the tunnel). > > However, if you like to share some information how to set up one myself, I am > happy to host a IPv6 demo server. Currently I am wondering how to accept > *any* public key in the [Peer] config. > > Cheers, > > Dan > >> Jason >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Dan Lüdtke <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Jason, >>> >>> do you plan on adding IPv6 compatibility to the demo server? If not, do you >>> mind if I set one up? How difficult is it to run the demo server. It just >>> accepts every key, right? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> WireGuard mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard > > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
