On Fri 2016-12-30 21:34:56 -0500, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > That's an interesting idea. The first concern that immediately comes > to mind is data leakage and CRIME-like compression attacks. We'd have > to tread very carefully in order to do this right. Is there a > particular implementation strategy for this you have in mind? > Historically adding compression to crypto protocols has been quite > risky.
This is my concern as well. We've only recently managed to get
compression ripped out of TLS, and i'd really like to avoid it finding
its way back into other network security protocols. The right place to
do compression is at the application layer, where it's at least possible
to distinguish between attacker-supplied traffic and user-sensitive
secrets.
Please do *not* add compressoin into wireguard itself!
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
