On Wed 2017-01-04 13:50:14 -0500, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey Christian, Daniel, Dan, and other maintainers,
>
> The next snapshot is going to have some improvements to the tooling,
> and along with this comes a more complicated Makefile. I wanted to run
> the changes by y'all (downstreams).
>
> - The makefile now has a few WITH_{FEATURE}=yes|no environment flags,
> as well as auto-detection. Documentation is here:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/plain/src/tools/INSTALL
> And the Makefile itself is here:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/src/tools/Makefile
>
> Question: does this propose a desirable situation for you as a downstream?Reading through INSTALL, these parameters look reasonable to me as a downstream. > - The wg-config script is now called wg-quick and is quite simple and > nice. Documentation: > https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/about/src/tools/wg-quick.8 > And source: > https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/src/tools/wg-quick.bash > > OpenWRT should _not_ ship this. NixOS probably should not ship this. > When systemd-networkd gets support for WireGuard, systemd-based > distros should not ship this. But everybody else who just wants a > simple rough script for quickly bringing up and down VPNs can ship > this, as it's a big help to users. It's installed according to the > documentation for the Makefile above. this also looks good. > - There's now an "upstream" systemd unit for wg-quick, called > [email protected]. It's pretty simple: > https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/src/tools/[email protected] > > Question: does this unit seem sane to you? Can you ship it downstream > as is, or will you need modifications? although i haven't tested it, a quick read through the .service file looks reasonable to me. Thanks for thinking about system integration stuff. --dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
