On 2017-05-16 17:01, Jonathan Rudenberg wrote: >> On May 16, 2017, at 09:12, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> wrote: >> >> So why not avoid any possible confusion and just emit JSON? Or another >> well-established serialisation format where the nesting can be made >> explicit... :) > +1 to this, requiring implementors to also implement a custom serialization > format will lead to avoidable bugs. > > I took a quick look and there is a bit of precedent for the use of JSON in > the kernel tree: > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/3401e8d1e1300742ed41910b9338b9da52689a16/tools/perf/pmu-events > > Jonathan
For the kernel, netlink will be used, which is already does its own serialization format. The use of JSON here, would not make sense here. _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
