On Thu, 25 May 2017 21:14:26 +0200 Kalin KOZHUHAROV <[email protected]> wrote:
Whoops, back in the loop ! (strange behavior of this ML: when you answer to the ML, it answers only to the sender :/) > Hello Jean-Yves, > > I apologize for the misunderstanding, I completely agree with your > advice! There's no need to apologize: this is not sooo grave ;-) I just wasn't sure about the meaning as it could be interpreted any way. > I guess the adding of "LoL" at the end didn't make that clearer, I > just re-read my tweet. > Thinking about it, I was re-editing it quite a few times to make it > fit the length restriction and the end result was not clear, when > taken out of context. "FAIL" for me, sorry. For your penance, you'll recite 3 times the whole 1970 Unix code forward AND backward, then you'll copy the wg-quick man 10 times with a plume and in Gothic ! Jean-Yves _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
