Hi!, iperf results! Peers: server 10.11.12.1 and client 10.11.12.2
UDP test 100MB transfer (with a size similar to the theoretical raspberry pi fast ethernet limit (100mbps) pi@raspberrypi:~ $ iperf -c 10.11.12.2 -u -p 12345 -t 30 -b 100M ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 10.11.12.2, UDP port 12345 Sending 1470 byte datagrams UDP buffer size: 160 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 10.11.12.3 port 47707 connected with 10.11.12.2 port 12345 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 278 MBytes 77.8 Mbits/sec [ 3] Sent 198395 datagrams [ 3] Server Report: [ 3] 0.0-30.3 sec 6.30 MBytes 1.75 Mbits/sec 11.417 ms 193896/198393 (98%) pi@raspberrypi:~ $ WITH the NEW SNAPSHOT (20170531) pi@raspberrypi:~ $ iperf -c 10.11.12.2 -u -t 30 -b 100M ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 10.11.12.2, UDP port 5001 Sending 1470 byte datagrams UDP buffer size: 160 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 10.11.12.3 port 59246 connected with 10.11.12.2 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 275 MBytes 77.0 Mbits/sec [ 3] Sent 196350 datagrams [ 3] Server Report: [ 3] 0.0-30.2 sec 6.67 MBytes 1.85 Mbits/sec 10.785 ms 191590/196347 (98%) [ 3] 0.0-30.2 sec 1 datagrams received out-of-order Results are what i expected, both rpi3 hitting the limit of the fast ethernet. I'm gonna test it with two routers (Netgear X4S nighthawk, with ARM neon and Gigabit ethernet interface). Best! On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Le Sandie <lesan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have tested the WireGuard-0.0.20170531 snapshot between two ARM peers > (a > > couple of rpi3s with the same snapshot) and it works nice. I haven't had > > time to iperf but will do to check that performance raise in ARM SoCs. > > Great, please do let me know. > > > > > Also i tested this snapshot with one ARM peer and the other peer with a > LEDE > > (17.01.1) router with wireguard and the handshake goes well but no > > connectivity between peers. If i downgrade the ARM peer snapshot to > > WireGuard-0.0.20170421, both peers see each other with connectivity. > > Probably when the openwrt/LEDE package maintainer bump up the package to > the > > new snapshot it will work. > > Yes indeed there was a backwards incompatible change made. The > openwrt/lede package already has been bumped, however, so just update > your system. > https://github.com/openwrt/packages/blob/master/net/wireguard/Makefile > -- Lt. Col. Sandie
_______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard