On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Geo Kozey <geoko...@mailfence.com> wrote: > No, with fixed resolv.conf pointing to local namserver only there would be no > DNS resolution as your cache has to come from somewhere. I'm talking > specifically about local nameserver without external connectivity but I think > users may want to use their own static nameservers with dynamic one which > they get from wg for whatever reason. Having to chose one over another as > only possibility isn't best solution IMO.
Usually people who do this usually point their cache toward the remote tunneled nameserver, via, say, dnsmasq's -S option. Some people do indeed enjoy multiple entries in their resolv.conf and rely on this generally buggy behavior, which means you could make an argument that I shouldn't be using openresolv's "-x" option, and maybe you'd have a case. But I don't care for nobs, and those powerusers probably don't want wg-quick anyway or can just use PostUp. In any case, this is a different issue from what this thread is trying to determine, so if you'd like to bikeshed -x vs -m and options and whatnot in openresolv, please do so on an entirely different thread with a different subject. _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
