Hi all, Wearing my 'Wireguard enthusiast who doesn't know *that* much about crypto, and only uses WG as an end-user' hat:
It sounds to me like additional complexity, additional code, and additional information leakage, for what seems to be a relatively uncommon scenario, which by the sounds of things could be addressed with fwmark. Are any of those observations incorrect? E -------------------------------------------- Q: Why is this email five sentences or less? A: http://five.sentenc.es On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, at 05:11, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Not sure the infoleak is worth it. > > List: thoughts? > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
