Hey Baptiste, On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Baptiste Jonglez <bapti...@bitsofnetworks.org> wrote: > Actually, now that I talk about it, it's not 100% true: on this system, > there is a second wireguard interface that is not currently used (it's > provisionned to connect a future router that is not yet deployed). > > The interesting part: this interface has a single peer which has no > endpoint but a persistent keepalive.
That's a super useful observation! I'm guessing this will fix it: https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/commit/?id=c5c22fb9bad1807a612b6055e0049d68f4600605 I'm still analyzing everything to find other places where I might have missed something, but hopefully the above does it. Jason _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
