Hey Baptiste,

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Baptiste Jonglez
<bapti...@bitsofnetworks.org> wrote:
> Actually, now that I talk about it, it's not 100% true: on this system,
> there is a second wireguard interface that is not currently used (it's
> provisionned to connect a future router that is not yet deployed).
> The interesting part: this interface has a single peer which has no
> endpoint but a persistent keepalive.

That's a super useful observation! I'm guessing this will fix it:

I'm still analyzing everything to find other places where I might have
missed something, but hopefully the above does it.

WireGuard mailing list

Reply via email to