On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:19 PM, David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> wrote: > I wasn't sure whether to suggest this before, but adding Wireguard > support to OpenConnect ought to be fairly easy. We already support > three VPN protocols, so we have a *relatively* sane distinction between > the protocol-specific parts, and all the OS-specific tun device > handling and other bits that would just be gratuitous wheel-reinvention > for you. > > It basically gives you support for Windows, Solaris, OSX, Android and > various BSDs for nothing. With NetworkManager support. > > For a client that *isn't* purely wrapping the kernel implementation, it > probably makes sense rather starting from scratch. If anyone's > interested in working on it, I'd be happy to give some pointers. > > (I've also looked in the past at adding kernel support too, for DTLS > acceleration; I may take a look at that again.)
That sounds pretty excellent. I'll add that the project TODO list and maybe we'll get an interested contributor or a GSoC student for it. By the way, how would you feel about doing this via the existing Go and Rust implementations? If I can jerry rig it into the build system, would you be interested? _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
