> On Jun 20, 2018, at 4:24 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Lonnie, > > Thanks for letting me know. Can you tell me if this patch -- > https://א.cc/GJpT3gVY -- brings the performance back up? And if that > works, can you then try each of those three fragments separate to see > which one has an actual effect (or perhaps all do). > > Jason
Hunk #1 only does the trick, though performance is ever so slightly slower than before overall. Is this issue because our project uses CONFIG_PREEMPT=y ? Data below. Lonnie -- 0.0.20180531 reference -- [SUM] 0.00-30.00 sec 2.65 GBytes 758 Mbits/sec 571 sender [SUM] 0.00-30.02 sec 2.64 GBytes 756 Mbits/sec receiver -- full patch -- hunk #1, #2 and #3 [SUM] 0.00-30.00 sec 2.53 GBytes 724 Mbits/sec 921 sender [SUM] 0.00-30.01 sec 2.52 GBytes 722 Mbits/sec receiver -- hunk #1 only -- [SUM] 0.00-30.00 sec 2.57 GBytes 735 Mbits/sec 807 sender [SUM] 0.00-30.01 sec 2.56 GBytes 733 Mbits/sec receiver -- hunk #2 only -- [SUM] 0.00-30.00 sec 1.52 GBytes 434 Mbits/sec 91 sender [SUM] 0.00-30.02 sec 1.51 GBytes 433 Mbits/sec receiver -- hunk #3 only -- [SUM] 0.00-30.00 sec 1.51 GBytes 432 Mbits/sec 330 sender [SUM] 0.00-30.03 sec 1.50 GBytes 430 Mbits/sec receiver _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
