On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:37 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:31 PM Chris Branch <cbra...@cloudflare.com> wrote: > > Your solution is the same one I tried, but I wasn't yet convinced it was > > the right one. I'll take it though! > > Did you run into issues with it? Or had particular doubts I should consider?
In case it helps in understanding this, the condition I'm trying to enforce, rather than the hack that the fix commit removed, is that rwcancel alone is responsible for calling SetNonblock, and after rwcancel is instantiated, nobody calls .Fd() ever again, but instead relies on the stored tun.fd member for access. _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
