Hi,

I figured out my multiple peer problem and can now connect both my Mac and 
iPhone to the Ubuntu server.  I didn’t read the AllowedIPs field description 
properly and I was thinking about it the wrong way.  In my email below, I was 
making the mistake of putting 0.0.0.0/0 in the AllowedIPs _on the the server_ 
which is clearly wrong.  I also had a look through the wg-quick code and now 
understand more of what it’s doing.

I’m still figuring out how to tunnel all traffic through the server.  If I have 
the Mac or iPhone with AllowedIPs=0.0.0.0/0 it makes sense to me now, but I 
can’t connect through to anywhere beyond the Ubuntu server.  I suspect it’s DNS 
setup stuff…

Cheers,
Gra

> On 6 Dec 2018, at 12:20 am, Graham Agnew <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I installed Wireguard on Ubuntu 14.04 using the PPA on Launchpad and the 
> wireguard-tools on my Mac.  I can get it to work with a very simple setup and 
> using wg-quick or “wg setconf”.  It’s really great how simple it is.
> 
> I don’t have as much luck with the command line “wg set”; it doesn’t like 
> parameters like allowed-ips and such.  Is this a known issue?  Analysing 
> wg-quick, it looks like it pipes the configuration into the "wg setconf” 
> command. 
> 
> I’m also having problems when I have two peers.  I have "AllowedIPs = 
> 0.0.0.0/0" for both in the .conf file, but this is only applied to the second 
> peer.  The first peer has “(none)” shown as its AllowedIPs with obvious 
> consequences.  Is this also a known issue?  I was trying to add my iPhone as 
> a second peer using the TestFlight app.  I couldn’t get this to work, even 
> when I tried to make a second interface on the Ubuntu server as a workaround. 
>  Is there a way to diagnose the issue?
> 
> I’m also unsure how the AllowedIPs setting is meant to work.  Initially I 
> thought it was a list of addresses the peer was allowed to connect to, but 
> the documentation seems to suggest it’s a list that the peer can connect 
> from.  Or is it a range of source IPs that the receiver will accept packets 
> from?  Using 0.0.0.0/0 seems to mess up my network configuration, routing 
> tables etc and I wonder if it’s some “smarts” in wg-quick I haven’t 
> understood.
> 
> Apologies if these are noob questions that stem from a lack of knowledge.  I 
> feel I need to get deeper into iptables etc to fully understand this.
> 
> Cheers,
> Gra

_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

Reply via email to