Sorry, forgot to copy the list.
> IANAL, but under GPLv2 as I understand it, you can make any modifications > privately for your own use, i.e., so long as you don’t have customers running > it. > > If you do have customers who will be running it, perhaps you could make Jason > an offer for a commercial license. I haven’t seen that question come up. > > A third option is BoringTun, a permissively licensed userspace Wireguard > implementation from Cloudflare. One would expect performance for userspace > implementations to be lower than for the kernel module, but perhaps with some > work to integrate netmap or Intel DPDK it could get pretty close. > > Fourth, if you port the kernel module to a permissively licensed kernel like > NetBSD or FreeBSD, it’s conceivable Jason would work with you on the license. > If I recall correctly. early in Wireguard’s development, Jason said he was > open to licensing his code to match the kernels for which it’s destined > (e.g., BSD license for a port to a BSD kernel). That was years ago, but it > might be worth inquiring. > > > Good luck, > George > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 17, 2019, at 3:32 AM, bhashkar prakash Singh >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I want to integrate Wireguard to my confidential project. I see Wireguard >> source code is under GPLv2, if I add any patch to Wiregaurd source code to >> work with my confidentail project, do I need to publish complete source code >> along with my project source code ? >> >> Any other pointer how I can start work to integrate Wireguard in my project >> will be highly appreciated. >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Bhashkar >> _______________________________________________ >> WireGuard mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
