On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 8:44 PM Phillip McMahon <[email protected]> wrote: > Won't drag this already long and confusing thread out. Not challenging > the current implementation, just the notion that any other suggestion > is a dead end and the topic is closed.
Alright. Well, if you do think of good reasons why NCO is not a good match for unpriv'd WireGuard control, please let me know. The whole basis of going that route is the apparent intuition that these two types of things, network modification and tunnel up/down, are one and the same. But if you have in mind a way where the analogy breaks down, that'd be very interesting to learn and would potentially be grounds for changing course. Jason
