On 2021-09-23 at 17:54:59 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> wrote: > I've applied this. Thanks for the patch. Though I do wonder: it's > functionally the same as before, right? What instances lead to this > being an issue? Or did this way just seem more correct?
Thanks. Functionally it's the same, yes. I noticed this when running staticcheck against wireguard-go on Linux and it reported (*NativeTun).operateOnFd as being defined but not used. So it just seemed more correct to only define it for platforms that actually use it.
