Hi everyone, On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:55 AM Nico Schottelius <[email protected]> wrote: > Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]> writes: > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:53:08 +0900, > > Nico Schottelius <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The problem is mostly orthogonal to Wireguard. There isn't going to be > > a one size fits all solution for hiding traffic.
Exactly. And it would be a big mistake to attempt to merge obfuscation support into WireGuard itself. Tor's approach of pluggable transports is probably the right one. https://www.wireguard.com/known-limitations/ "WireGuard does not focus on obfuscation. Obfuscation, rather, should happen at a layer above WireGuard, with WireGuard focused on providing solid crypto with a simple implementation. It is quite possible to plug in various forms of obfuscation, however." Here are my arguments: https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2018-September/003292.html Cheers, Fredrik Stromberg
