----- On Sep 22, 2022, at 6:43 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:22 AM Bruno <ban...@ut1.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Windows Client project don't feel alive either. Last commit has 6 months
>> and last release is 9 month old.
>> Same, here https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-windows/log/ and here
>> https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-windows
>> Version 0.5.3 works well, but I suppose it can be even better!
> That seems pretty uncalled for. Folks asking for a wireguard-apple
> update have good reason to do so -- there are outstanding bugs and
> pull requests. But for wireguard-windows/wireguard-nt? C'mon now --
> that's received some *extremely* active development, stabilizing after
> nearly weekly updates for some time. Are there outstanding pull
> requests for it? So your note here really isn't appreciated. The
> WireGuard project doesn't churn out code and updates just for the sake
> of writing code and doing updates. Things need to have rationale.
> There will be updates to wireguard-windows/wireguard-nt at some point
> when development makes sense there. But right now? Is there something
> pending? Instead maybe be thankful that that software has reached a
> point of stability where project development energies can go into more
> pressing tasks, such as wireguard-apple.
> Jason

I could not agree more.  What a world we live in where code that hasn't been 
touched for a few months is considered stale, rather than being rewarded and 
appreciated for reliability and stability.  Jason, congratulations on not 
needing to touch that code for six months!  Much of the beauty of Wireguard is 
its simplicity, to the point that it can be done "right", and it really 
shouldn't need to be touched!

Reply via email to