|
Hello
from Maryland...
We now
use Vernier for authentication/security - originally we had users register the
MAC address of the wireless card and then they would have access at
anytime. We deployed Vernier products at our Shady Grove site in
October of 2002 and it has been running great ever since. We
turned Vernier on at College Park on August 1 2003. We mainly wanted
Vernier for breaking up the big VLAN and to retire the MAC registration process
and provide single session authentication. Since we have found GREAT uses
for example - it was very easy to block the ports the last few weeks Viruses
were using and keep infected users off the wireless network - through the use of
port blocking and redirection we didn't have any problems on the wireless
side
802.1x
didn't seem like a fit at the time I looked at it
we
broadcast our SSID,
we
have over 270 access points deployed on campus and running through
Vernier
we
have a Cisco vpn solution for users that want to make use of
it
we use
Cisco access points
Leah
Goldman
University of Maryland
301.405.4416
-----Original Message-----
From: 802.11 wireless issues listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dewitt Latimer Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 6:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs. Bluesocket/Reefedge vs. VPN ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/cg/. |
Title: Message
- RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs. Bluesocket/Reefedge vs. VPN Leah Goldman
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs. Bluesocket/Reefedge vs.... Nicola Foggi
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs. Bluesocket/Reefedge vs.... William Paraska
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.1x vs. Bluesocket/Reefedge vs.... Garret Yoshimi
