|
I have
heard the same rumor, but have often wondered whether it's one of those
marketing simplifications.
I may
be wrong, and if so would love to be corrected, but I think a better statement
would be that because of the time division involved in using the same
frequency for different speed connections, the slow links use a
disproportionate amount of the bandwidth that is available to the access point
and the client.
Speaking strickly theoretically, a 1KByte/sec file
transfer on a 1M link will take 11KB of bandwith from the
device connected via an 11M link, and 50K of bandwith from the client
at the 50M link.
Put
another way, at 50% utilization of the 1M link, you will still be using 50% of
the 11M link.
So yes
an active 1M device can be disasterous to your new 802.11g network performance,
but I dont' think a passively associated device affects your transfer speed to
your high bandwidth device .
I
might try to verify this by manually configuring a 350 client to only
nego so I'll let you know what I find out.
Even
if I am wrong, this is as good as gets from the physical limitations of shared
media.
David Metzler
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric T. Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 12:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP Bandwidth Question ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/cg/. |
Title: Message
