Rusty- In many ways I agree with Dale that Cisco's approach has been pretty convoluted, and thus quite lame. Even so- and I know it can be a passionate discussion- I wasn't looking to debate SWAN?Unified Networking versus Thin APs and WCS- though it is good discussion going through the list. Just looking to maybe use a feature that's available, but hoping those on the list that have been there could speak to whether it would be a mistake. We already use the WLSE and fat APs, that will change in the farther future. Self-healing in the current framework of WLSE/Fat APs/NO WLSM, if it works without headache (and that's what I haven't heard specific comment on yet) it may have benefit.
Not trashing Dale at all- please don't read it that way. Regards- Lee >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/6/2005 2:19:01 PM >>> Dale W. Carder wrote: > On Dec 6, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Lee Badman wrote: > >> I am contemplating piloting a rather large new building to use >> Cisco's WLSE/AP "self healing" features- have had some success with >> it in small test areas. Wondering if anyone is using it on a larger >> scale and has either gotten comfortable with it or has experienced >> pain as a result. > > > I'll be blunt. > Dale, You gave em the answers all right. Looks like from Lee Badmans' reply he didn't really want to hear answers to his question other than the 'self healing' part. -- Rusty Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Wisconsin Madison Division of Information Technology Network Services 1210 W. Dayton St. Rm B116 Madison WI 53706 (608) 263-6307 ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
