Tom,

I would like to start of by saying that we also are a big Aruba networks shop. We replaced out FAT 802.11b AP’s with Aruba a/b/g AP 70’s and it could have been any easier if we tried. (2 people) Some here my lead you to believe that controllers are PC’s but each company they quoted has a dedicated appliance. I know that the Aruba 5000/6000 controllers have dedicated processors for each wireless process for example Firewall, encryption, etc. Aruba also just announced a code upgrade the will enable the controllers to handle and I quote here  “A single Aruba WLAN system is now capable of supporting up to 1000 simultaneous 802.1X authentication transactions per second” They also have plans to handle 802.11n as well. Don’t be lead down the path that thin AP’s are proprietary that is just not the case, they adhere to the same standards as the FAT’s. IMHO the deep frying of AP’s is going to be in the FAT AP’s, just ask me I have 500 802.11b AP’s ready to drop into the fry-O-lator. :-)   

 

 

Brian J David

Network Systems Engineer

Boston College


From: Zeller, Tom S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 9:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Controller Architecture vs FAT APs

 

I would be interested in other opinions on the following analysis of this issue:

 

 

  1. Using AirWave’s AMP management platform has almost eliminated the management advantage of the controller-based architecture (CBA).  AMP monitors, reports, and updates Fat APs just fine.  Also, some CBAs don’t yet have a single management platform for multiple controllers.
  2. CBA is considerably more expensive, in the 1.5 – 2.0 x range compared to Fat APs
  3. The other advantages of CBA boil down to the following.  If others I’d like to hear.  And if these are fictitious, also of interest:
    1. Roaming, theoretically across an entire campus, without requiring a single vlan
    2. Significantly faster handoff between APs due to 802.1x keys on the controller, important for voice support.
    3. Automagic dense AP deployment from radio feedback to and adjustments from controller (or Meru’s approach).

 

Obviously I’m considering sticking with Fat APs for another few years and allowing the CBA products to mature, but  I ain’t got no religion here, and would welcome success/horror stories from large scale CBA deployments.

 

Tom Zeller

Indiana University

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

812-855-6214

 

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to