No problem. >>> Lee Badman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/6/2007 10:47 AM >>> Thanks, Tony-
I am hearing all of the many ways Concannon is going to possibly touch some of the current deficiencies in the LWAPP system, but have not been able to extract any tangible information from Cisco on it. Lee Lee Badman, KC2IYK Network/Wireless Engineer CWNA, CWSP Information Technology and Services Syracuse University 315 443-3003 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/6/2007 8:33:25 AM >>> Lee, This is a known issue with element tracking. I have been talking with the Beta Concannon team on the new Beta (4.1) Concannon release, and they have ensured me that this will be fixed in this version (4.1.x) targeted for the end of April, early May. They will also be including the ability to view each element that is tracked, and the ability to choose the elements you want to track. Give it a few weeks, or two, and you will have many new options with this and it will be fixed. Thanks, Tony Roberts Network Engineer Indiana State University Office of Information Technology 210 N 7th Street Tirey Hall Room 065 Terre Haute, IN 47809 Office 812-237-8854 FAX 812-237-4361 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************* This email, and any attachments, thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. ******************************************************* >>> Lee Badman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/6/2007 8:19 AM >>> Am seeing a running condition on our two Cisco Location Appliances, where we show constant orange error on WCS for hitting the maximum of 2,500 objects tracked- though the WCS itself reports far less. We have told the appliances to only log clients (not rogues, RFID tags, etc.) and have cut the history way done as per Cisco. There is no overlap in network designs assigned to our two servers- meaning that any one network design is assigned only to a single location server. Even when WCS says that each location server sees less than 1500 clients, Location Appliance alarm is pegged. My sense is that we may not the only environment experiencing this condition. Wondering if anyone else has had to go down this road, and if there has been any remediation or explanation for the condition identified? Thanks- Lee Badman ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
