Comments in-line.
 
Frank

  _____  

From: Emerson Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's


Rogue containment does have some drawbacks in performance under certain
scenarios..
 
Rogue scanning:
 
If you have a valid AP that is capable of scanning other channels for
rogues, it can take 5-7 minutes to find the rogue if there is minimal
traffic on the device.  This is a simple factor of the scan interval and
channel dwell time.  
 
FB> It would frighten me if it actually took a WLAN infrastructure vendor
5-7 minutes to find a rogue AP, even if their 'sensor' was an AP acting in
both modes.  Most of the WIDPS vendors identified rogues in seconds, with
Network Chemistry and AirTight generally being the fastest.  AirMagnet can
have a several-minute delay depending on when the sensor submits it's batch
to the server.
 
 These scanning intervals are generally configurable. For instance, you can
configure scanning to occur every x seconds and for x amount of
milliseconds.  Vendors should have the ability to not go off-channel and
stop scanning if there is certain types of traffic present on the APs set
channel (extended ACL, VoIP, gold queue, etc). 
 
FB> It would be ideal if WLAN customers didn't have to worry about it.  Most
of the time defaults are OK.  It's true that time-sensitive wireless traffic
can be affected by the scan settings, and WLAN vendors are doing a better
job of mitigating and working around that, but it's still not perfect.
 
Finding a rogue:
 
so lets say an AP that is serving clients is on channel 1 and during the
scan interval, they found a rogue on channel 13 (people try to hide rogues
on international channels).
 
What do you want the AP to do?  If you disassociate clients attached to the
rogue over the air, this takes time away from the users being served on
channel 1.  A rogue AP can act as a DoS attack on valid APs.  The valid AP
is spending all of its time deauthing and not serving clients.
 
This to should be a configurable option.  killing rogues at the expense of
valid clients, or kill the rogues during your scan interval.  If a rogue
comes up on channel 1, the AP can easily kill the rogue and continue serving
its clients but that is rarely the case!
 
Dedicated rogue killers:
 
if you have a few dedicated AP acting as rogue killers, then you can happily
kill rogues all day and do all kinds of other kool stuff.  A rogue killer AP
only needs to hear and txmit at the 1-2mbps range to kill rogues over vast
distances so you can spread them out thin. 
 
FB> At the end of the day, if you want best in class capabilities you need
to set asides units to act solely as sensor or air monitors. 
 
LAN based rogue killing:
 
Some Wireless infrastructure can kill rogues from the LAN by looking at MAC
forwarding tables and shutting down ports on a switch.  Some vendors will do
an ARP-poison attack  in conjunction with what is going on out in the air.. 
 
FB> Bridge APs, as mentioned earlier, can be nearly invisible.  Fortunately,
they aren't very popular in retail stores. 
 
conclusion:  If you have some dedicated resources (APs) to kill rogues, do
it.

  _____  

From: ktaillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's


Will you be using the Containment option in the WCS? Or hunting down the
units and removing them from the Network. Could someone point out some of
the pro's and con's to using containment..
 

  _____  

From: Lee H Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's


With wireless rolling out on a much larger scale on our campus, we are
revising our policy and attitude to be a bit more restrictive in both
philosophy and practice when it comes to UNCOORDINATED rogues. We are also
taking a stab at coordinating not just APs, but also ANY wireless system-
classroom response systems, wireless AV, etc.- trying to keep the
environment somewhat under control as more wireless technologies hit. Not
always restrictive per se, but more coordinated.
 
Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
KC2IYK, CWNA/CWSP
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003
  _____  

From: M. Sjulstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Rogue AP's
 
We too have the policy of no rogues, but I admit I don't go looking for
them.  I know we have them, probably a lot more than I know of, but as long
as they aren't causing problems, I don't really care.   Worst things I've
seen are mis-configured APs that want to be a DHCP server and try handing
out IPs on the wired side.
 
Mike
 
 
_________________________________
M. Sjulstad
Network/Electronics Engineer - IIT Dept.
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN  55057
_____________
1-507-786-3835
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.stolaf.edu/people/sjulstad



 
On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Brian J David wrote:



I just wanted to here from other schools on what they are doing about
Rogues. Is your policy not to allow them but don't do too much to prevent
them.
Do you let the dorms be the wild wild west? Or are you actively finding them
and removing them through one means or another. We are an Aruba networks
shop
and have some great capabilities for Rogue detection and prevention and
wanted to get a feel what other schools process is concerning them. Also any
horror stories that you would like to share?
 
Brian J David
Network Systems Engineer
Boston College
 
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
 
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription
information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found
at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and
subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list
can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation
and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion
list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to