We have two CAT6506s, one with a single WiSM (our backup platform) and the 
second with three WiSMs.


The first CAT6506/single Wism has no users and is only used to test new code 
levels and act as a
set of spares for the other box (soon to be several more). The WiSM on this box 
is running
4.0.206.0.

The second CAT6505/three WiSMs supports what little wireless we have moved to 
the lightweight stuff
-- 319 LWAPPs with 300-400 users so far. The WiSMs on this box are running 
4.0.206.0 & 4.0.219.0.

I will move them all up to 4.1 (maybe 4.2) at the end of the semester so I have 
some breathing room
to fight problems.

The first/almost idle CAT6506 shows a CPU utilization of 0-1% all the time. The 
second CAT6506
shows an average utilization of 0-1% with peaks of 4%. Not much difference 
between the two.

-jcw


> To: [email protected]
> From: James J J Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wisms CPU
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:10:38 +0000
> Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
>               <[email protected]>
> 
> Hi All,
>    A quick question for those out there with WISMs... What level of  
> CPU usage are you experiencing (with how many users)?
> 
> A bit of background...
> We have two wism blades (4 wisms) and since we purchased them in  
> about april'07 they were running at about 35%, rising to 50% at peak  
> times, with frequent spikes up to about 90%. The spikes were  
> worrying, but the average seemed ok, and as they did this from day  
> one I was under the impression this was the norm.
> 
> Recently, we upgraded to the 4.2.x.y stream from 4.1. As has been  
> covered in other recent posts, 4.2 has some outstanding issues (more  
> than others anyway) and things became unstable... so we decided to go  
> back to 4.1.85.0 (TAC hasn't provided us with any solutions for 4.2  
> issues). We had a backup of our previous 4.1 config, but I chose not  
> to use it and start again from scratch (a few things had changed, so  
> either way involved work)
> 
> Since the reversion to 4.1.85.0, our cpu usage now averages 2% and  
> peaks at 6% at peak times (220 waps, ~350 users).
> [4.1.85.0, 12.2(18)SXF7]
> 
> Thanks,
>    James
> 
> --
> James J J Hooper
> Network Specialist
> Information Services
> University of Bristol
> http://www.wireless.bristol.ac.uk
> --
> 
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent 
> Group discussion list 
> can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
> 




----------------------------------------------------------------
John Watters  UA: Office of Information Technology  205-348-3992

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to