I don't know how big your installation is, but once you get over a dozen
or so AP's, it really is worth getting a wireless LAN controller of some
sort.  We have a Cisco 4402 (comments about Cisco/Microsoft and herd
mentality deleted).  Managing the AP's manually gets to be a real pain
at that point and having a WLC saves lots of time.

Thanks
John

John York
Network Engineer
Blue Ridge Community College
1 College Lane, Weyers Cave, VA 24486



-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Jr., D.
Michael
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

In the past, we have always setup wireless access points to use channels
3, 6, and 11, since these channels are the non-overlapping channels.  We
have tried to be careful in spacing out APs and picking one of these
three channels where it seems appropriate to prevent interference from
one another.

A question was posed by someone in my staff about using the "least
congested channel" setting instead of going through all the trouble of
determining and setting the channel.

So, the questions are...

1.  What are you other institutions doing about channel selection on
your Access Points?
2.  If you are using 3, 6, and 11, what is your strategy for use and
what problems and/or successes have you seen?
3.  If you are not using 3, 6, and 11, why not? What are you doing? And
what problems and/or successes have you seen?


Any input is appreciated.

Thanks,

D. Michael Martin, Jr.
Network Administrator
University of Montevallo

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to