This is not a vendor invite to "educate" me. Please, no vendor calls.

As we play with a couple of the major players' 11n stuff (and a couple of 
consumer grade units for giggles)- am seeing a definite trend. Wondering if 
others have seen the same. I know of the many variables of wireless in general, 
and specifically with 11n, but despite all of that I'm still a bit surprised 
over these.

The quick setup:

-          wide channels only
-          5 GHz only, 2.4 radios disabled
-          Channels are not interfering between hardware sets
-          Where it can be toggled in hardware, SGI is in use
-          All clients tested close to each AP, and with a wall or two between
-          2 X 3 and 3 X 3 in use
-          Variety of clients- XP/Mac/Vista on WPA2/EAS/PEAP-MSCHAPv2- no-NAC 
connections
-          In-house speed test utilities and FTP transfers used in early testing

What seems strange, in general:

-          The wild inconsistency of data rates. On the new Mac versions you 
can see data rate, channel, associated AP by doing "alt- click on radar icon". 
If you do this repeatedly from several different Macs, they all show data rates 
that fluctuate between 300 Mbps and very low rates- like 6 Mbps. Doesn't matter 
of you have straight on LOS or walls and multipath, and regardless of what 
hardware set you're using, this fluctuation can be shown at will
-          Actual throughput in the 11a/11g world is typically slightly under 
half of the stated date rate in conversation and function. I'm seeing 11n is 
more like 1/3 (or less)- if client data rate is stated as 300 Mbps, throughput 
is at best around 110 (or 100, or 90) on interference free channels- regardless 
of hardware set
-          From the same spot, download/upload speeds can very wildly- test 
after test might be different (stated data rate of 300, typical throughputs of 
60 Mbps up/90 down, 110/ 80, 70/75, 113/90, 60/65, 100,58, etc) from same 
client, and all clients tested act the same way- wildly variable

I don't consider any of this "controlled" testing yet, and am just now starting 
to get ready to do for-real testing as we slowly advance toward 11n. But wanted 
to float these observations and see if others have found similar variability 
and have drawn conclusions about it.

-Lee

Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003


**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to