Oh, OK. Sounds like Justin has a memory leak issue with 4.2.176 though. Is that correct Justin?

On Jun 30, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Bentley, Douglas wrote:

CSCsq87549/CSCsq63106(memory leaks) Sorry that is the issue within 4.2.130

CSCsx07878—Client devices no longer intermittently fail to log into a WLAN with web authentication (webauth). This one broke us in 4.2.176. We are using the internal web re-direct for authentication. This does not work properly in 4.2.176.


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn42205D3MR4.html
The fix for this is in 4.2.205.

Sorry for the confusion.

-Doug


Douglas Bentley | University IT/NC Network Engineering
University of Rochester | 727 Elmwood Ave.| Rochester, NY 14620
T: 585.275.6550 | Email: douglas.bent...@rochester.edu

      <image003.jpg>

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU ] On Behalf Of Brandon Pinsky
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:05 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 3750G and 1131

Does anyone have a BugID for the memory leak issue in 4.2.176? Thanks,

--------------
B.J. Pinsky
Manager, Core Resources
New York Presbyterian Hospital
Columbia University Medical Center
(o): 212-305-9021
(m): 917-626-9485
b...@nyp.org
630 W. 168th Street
PH18-126
NY, NY 10032

On Jun 30, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Bentley, Douglas wrote:

> I completely agree with the 4.2.176 statement.  We are having the
> same issue with the memory leak on our 14 controllers.  After a
> month of testing, we are upgrading to 4.2.205 at 5am tomorrow.
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
>
> Douglas Bentley | University IT/NC Network Engineering
> University of Rochester | 727 Elmwood Ave.| Rochester, NY 14620
> T: 585.275.6550 | Email: douglas.bent...@rochester.edu
>
>       <image002.jpg>
>
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> ] On Behalf Of Justin Hao
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:50 PM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 3750G and 1131
>
> Howdy,
>
> regarding 4.2.176 i can absolutely positively NOT recommend it as a
> stable code base, 4.2.205 is a direct release containing a critical
> bugfix that we had a direct hand in "motivating" cisco to fix
> promptly.
>
> 4.2.176 contains a memory leak in involving mobility groups of size
> (our setup is approximately 1700 APs with 18 controllers).  This
> memory leak is fatal, the general gist is that stateful information
> regarding mobility clients isn't released properly from memory as
> clients come/go, thus driving memory usage on controllers constantly
> up until they crash ungracefully with little or no crash/log
> information, controllers also take an inordinate (20+ minutes)
> amount of time to recover from the crash, i presume because they're
> attempting to log crash data and there isn't any memory available
> for that.  We observed controllers cycle to 98-99% memory every 8
> weeks until they crashed.  Working with the dev engineer they tested
> and monitored two of our controllers for several weeks to identify
> the issue.  I don't know the "critical" size or number of APs/
> controllers required to have this be a noticeable issue, but
> ungraceful controller reboots occurred every 8 weeks with our setup.
>
> We are currently running 4.2.205 and haven't experienced an "event"
> anymore, so i'd recommend 4.2.205 if you need to run 4.2.x code, we
> haven't had any experience with any 5.x code at all at this time,
> since cisco pulled support for the 10xx series APs from anything
> newer than 4.x.
>
> --------
> Justin Hao
> Texas A&M University
> Network Group
> (979)862-2162
> j...@net.tamu.edu
> --------
>
> On Jun 29, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Mike King wrote:
>
>
> Both 4.2.205 and 4.2.176 have been designated as:
>
> AssureWave The Cisco® AssureWave program focuses on satisfying
> customer quality requirements in critical vertical  markets in the
> wireless space. This program links and expands on product testing
> conducted within development engineering, regression testing, and
> systems test groups within Cisco. AssureWave certification marks the
> successful completion of extensive integrity testing that validates
> targeted releases.  In addition, Cisco’s AssureWaveprogram ensures
> compatibility with major device and application vendors through
> established partnerships.  Cisco’s partners perform extensive
> testing at their own facilities to ensure broader interoperability
> with our ongoing new releases. Learn More
>
> So I'd feel safe with them.  No higher releases have been certified
> under this program..
>
> (Assurewave replace Safeharbor testing for wireless)
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Pham, Loc <loc.p...@ucsfmedctr.org>
> wrote:
>    Guys: I am ready to config and test 3750G on a 4.2.205 code
>
>  Beside this bug, any other good stuffs that I should look for ?
> CSCsu02630
>
>  I am also ( tempted ) to go with the 5.2 for CWAPP functionality if
> time permit....
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Loc Pham, CCIE # 17030 - Sr. Network Staff,
>
> IT Enterprise Security & Services, UCSF Medical Center.
>
> Office 415-353-4492 Pager 415-443-9014
>
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this
> EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/
> .
>
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this
> EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/
> .
>
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this
> EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/
> .
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this
> EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/
> .
>



--------------------

This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named recipient, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error or are not the named recipient, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender at the electronic mail address noted above, and delete and destroy all copies of this message. Thank you.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/ . ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/ .




--------------------

This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named 
recipient, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error or are not the 
named recipient, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender at the 
electronic mail address noted above, and delete and destroy all copies of this 
message.  Thank you.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to