I run WCS 6 in development- it is a welcome improvement. There are so many mixed messages on controller code, we'll be holding off on any thoughts of going to 6 until the end of the year.
Also, how are other 4400/WiSM customers dealing with the certain NIC/slow 11n throughput issue? -Lee Lee H. Badman Wireless/Network Engineer Information Technology and Services Syracuse University 315 443-3003 -----Original Message----- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of song Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 8:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 3750G and 1131 haven't heard much positive feedbacks about WCS code for quite a long time, anybody else is using 6.0 code? - Leo Song, Cluster Lead - Networking and Security (519) 824-4120 x 53181 CCS, University of Guelph On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 15:31 -0400, Mike King wrote: > Anyone got any horror stories about 6.0? > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Jeffrey Sessler > <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd move straight to the 6.0 code. It's probably the best > controller, radio, and WCS code release I've seen so far from > Cisco. We spent about a year working directly with Cisco on > 5.2 controller/AP code improvements which have been rolled > into the new 6.0 code. Now on 6.0 for about a month, it's been > rock solid in our environment. > > Jeff > > Jeffrey D Sessler > Director > Information Technology > Scripps College > >>> "Pham, Loc" <[email protected]> 06/29/09 1:32 PM >>> > > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this > EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
