We do have a similar setup although we are fast changing. We do OOB for wired with Cisco NAC (CCA). For wireless it still in-band with CCA. No offense but CCA seems to be a (and have been) very problematic product for us and we are hoping to change that soon.
Thanks Manoj ------------------------------ P. Manoj Abeysekera, CWNA Network Engineer American University 4200 Wisconsin Ave, NW Washington DC. 20016 Kevin Fitzgerald <[email protected]> Sent by: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[email protected]> 07/24/2009 10:21 AM Please respond to The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject [WIRELESS-LAN] Replacing Bluesocket with Cisco NAC (formerly known as Clean Access) Hello all, We are currently in the process of replacing our Bluesocket Secured Controller appliances with Cisco's NAC. The Bluesockets are only used for LDAP auth (user login). In our environment we will be doing wireless and wired out-of-band (OOB) in virtual gateway mode, and our NAC is centrally deployed. Our wireless access points operate in lightweight mode using Cisco Wireless Lan Controllers. All of our WAPS are Cisco 1231 (LWAPP) running off of Cisco WLCs. We are moving to a Cisco end-to-end solution composed of the NAC, WLCs, and WAPs. I'd love to hear from some folks who have already gone down this road. The documentation that I've read often refers to RADIUS accounting records. Has anyone implemented a wireless OOB solution with LDAP? Kindest regards, K. Fitzgerald Computing Services Networks University of Arkansas at Little Rock ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
