I would be interested to learn more as well. I do have a clarification question. By NAC are we talking about the Cisco product or the general concept of NAC?
Regards, -- Jim Jim Moskwa Manager Networks & Security Information Technology Department Johnson & Wales University 8 Abbott Park Place Providence, RI 02903 Office: 401-598-1556 Fax: 401-598-1329 Email: [email protected] From: Daniel Eklund <[email protected]> Reply-To: "EDUCAUSE." <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:39:43 -0500 To: "EDUCAUSE." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Summary of Educause WLAN meeting + Results of Survey I'd be interested in more detail on the concerns about NAC. Was this session recorded? -- Daniel Eklund Director, Networking Wayne State University 313-577-5558 ----- "Philippe Hanset" <[email protected]> wrote: > #NAC > -Quite a few people in the audience where moving away from NAC > (unpleased with current solutions, too many problems compared > to benefits) > -One person very satisfied with a not well known solution > -One person very satisfied with a well known solution > -A fairly large consensus on making the network itself more robust > (using switches, Routers, APs, and controllers) to prevent common > attacks > eg: prevent traffic between users on wireless (no Windows share) > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
