Exact same reasons here!
And by the way: Season's Greetings to all listeners of wireless-
l...@educause
Philippe Hanset
wireless-...@educause constituent leader
Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville
On Dec 23, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Julian Y. Koh wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 2:24 PM -0500 12/23/09, David Blahut wrote:
We are beginning to deploy encrypted wireless and I am looking for
some
words of wisdom. Mainly what method you used and what reasons as
to why
you chose said method or any reason you wish you had not.
We went with EAP-PEAPv0 (MS-CHAPv2) for authentication because
that's what
was supported by the built-in Windows supplicant. Our tech support
organization has always had a strong preference for using built-in
solutions as opposed to having to support the installation of 3rd-
party
software.
We chose WPA2 encryption, supporting AES/CCMP only, no TKIP. We
made this
conscious decision because we wanted to reduce complexity and not
support
legacy hardware.
Overall things have worked out well.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 9.9.1.287
wj8DBQFLMnDyDlQHnMkeAWMRAp0rAKCTmiZX5QRfaL0CtbAbZPKaVaGDAgCg1QGf
efmA90WBxk/el54A/FXJ3h0=
=l66X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Julian Y. Koh
<mailto:[email protected]>
Manager, Network Transport <phone:
847-467-5780>
Telecommunications and Network Services Northwestern
University
PGP Public Key:<http://bt.ittns.northwestern.edu/julian/
pgppubkey.html>
**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/
.
**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
