Under cli

Add the following to your user-role for captive portal

max-sessions 50

Using the web you can select the user-role for your captive portal

Look for Max Sessions tab and set to 50

Remember you may need to tweak this a bit depending on your particular page.

Steveh


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W. (NS)
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 7:28 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] blocking broadcast/multicast?

Stephen,

You are a wealth of information. How do you limit the bunber of sessions on a 
role? I know you can limit the bandwidth used, but that is not the same thing.

Thanks,
Bruce Osborne
Liberty University
________________________________
From: Holland, Stephen [s.holl...@neu.edu]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: blocking broadcast/multicast?
Ryan,

You are correct that we are running M3's today. However, when we originally 
used the filter it was with the Sup2 cards. We were getting unexplained CPU 
spikes and we could not determine why.  One of the recommendations by Aruba was 
to create the following filter and apply to our secure and non-secure roles:

ip access-list eth DenyIPv6
  deny 0x86dd
  permit any


If anybody is following this thread and wants to try this APPLY THE FILTER TO 
THE LOCAL CONTROLLERS AND MASTER FIRST....Then apply filter to the appropriate 
roles.  If you don't do it in this order the controller will not associate the 
role with the filter correctly and it will not work. When we applied we saw CPU 
go down and not up but that was our experience.

In regards to the CPU spikes we found users in the initial captive portal role 
who had 300 - 400 sessions open with the controller. When we blacklisted the 
user the CPU went back down.  We never found out who the users were so we could 
not determine why they created so many sessions. We did however limit the 
number of sessions on the initial role to 50 (need enough sessions for DHCP, 
Portal and other things required to make the portal page operate) and the 
problem went away.

Stephen Holland
Network Engineer
Northeastern University




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Ryan Holland
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:09 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] blocking broadcast/multicast?

Stephen,

Ha!

I'm assuming you're running the M3 supervisor cards.  We're using SUP-IIs, and 
they get taxed easily.

==========
Ryan Holland
Network Engineer, Wireless
Office of the Chief Information Officer
The Ohio State University
614-292-9906   holland....@osu.edu<mailto:holland....@osu.edu>

On Jun 30, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Holland, Stephen wrote:

Ryan,

Believe it or not the filter does not dent the controller CPU in the least. 
Aruba was the one who recommended the filter to cut down CPU usage.  All of our 
controllers running under 1% on all CPU's.

BTW: I like the last name! We could be brothers...........

Thanks

Stephen Holland
Network Engineer
Northeastern University

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Ryan Holland
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 2:08 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] blocking broadcast/multicast?

Stephen,

Blocking IPv6 via the policy enforcement firewall can add an incredible amount 
of processing on the controller, as each and every frame must be inspected. If 
you do not support v6 on wireless, it is much more efficient to just turn it 
off. You said "vlan pooling", so I assume you have Aruba. Issue the following: 
no ipv6 enable

==========
Ryan Holland
Network Engineer, Wireless
Office of the Chief Information Officer
The Ohio State University
614-292-9906   holland....@osu.edu<mailto:holland....@osu.edu>

On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Holland, Stephen wrote:


We found that IPv6 broadcast traffic contributed significantly to our wireless 
broadcast traffic. Since we don't support IPv6 on the wireless network we 
blocked the ethertype for IPv6 on our wireless controllers.  Also, running vlan 
pooling with /23's.

On a different topic related to bcast/mcast.   Our wireless controllers connect 
to a pair of 4948 switches which then connect to Cisco routers which provide 
the vlans for wireless users.  We use HSRP for redundancy. We realized there is 
no need to send the mcast traffic for HSRP out to the vlans which support our 
wireless users. As long as the routers see each other's HSRP updates it does 
not make sense to forward them to the wireless network. We created a filter to 
block the HSRP updates on the 4948 switches and applied it in the outbound 
direction toward the wireless controllers. For some reason the filter did not 
work. Doing some testing we found the filter is working because it drops 
updates if we apply it in the inbound direction. Does anybody know the filter 
would not work in the outbound direction?.

Thanks

Stephen Holland
Network Engineer
Northeastern University

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Marcelo Lew
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 10:05 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] blocking broadcast/multicast?

Hi Bruce, looks like we have a very similar setup.
I was thinking of doing what you described on the second paragraph of your 
reply.

Marcelo Lew
Wireless Network Specialist
University Technology Services
University of Denver
Desk: (303) 871-6523
Cell: (303) 669-4217
Fax:  (303) 871-5900
Email: m...@du.edu<mailto:m...@du.edu>

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W. (NS)
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:31 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] blocking broadcast/multicast?

Marcelo,


You need to be careful blocking broadcasts, or you may need to statically set 
ip addresses on all your clients. DHCP uses broadcast.

We are an Aruba shop. On our normal data SSIDs  we set "Drop Broadcast and 
Multicast" and "Convert Broadcast ARP requests to unicast" On our high speed 
(5GHz 802.11n only, 24mbit lowest transmit rate) we allow multicast to the 
students can watch IPTV video on wireless. To accomplish this, we have "Dynamic 
Multicast Optimization"  enabled, which converts the multicast streams to 
unicast.

Without "Dynamic Multicast" Optimization" multicast data is limited to the rate 
of the slowest 802.11 client. Blocking multicast is a good way to reduce 
unnecessary airtime.

We use a VLAN pool of /23 networks to reduce the local broadcast domain for 
each client too. This helps reduce unnecessary traffic.

Bruce Osborne
Network Engineer
Liberty University


From: Marcelo Lew [mailto:m...@du.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 1:10 PM
Subject: blocking broadcast/multicast?

Wondering how many of you are blocking broadcast/ multicast on the wifi 
network?  If so, do you allow it on certain SSIDs?  Do you get a lot of user 
complains about this?  I would like to reduce unnecessary use of airtime, 
however, "unnecessary" can mean many different things depending who you ask...

Marcelo Lew
Wireless Network Specialist
University Technology Services
University of Denver
Desk: (303) 871-6523
Cell: (303) 669-4217
Fax:  (303) 871-5900
Email: m...@du.edu<mailto:m...@du.edu>

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
________________________________


Not spam<about:blank>
Forget previous vote<about:blank>
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
________________________________

Spam<https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?i=1057754690&m=1c945ada071c&c=s>
Not spam<https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?i=1057754690&m=1c945ada071c&c=n>
Forget previous 
vote<https://antispam.osu.edu/b.php?i=1057754690&m=1c945ada071c&c=f>
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to