After doing a little bit more testing for curiosity sake, I can confirm what
you were seeing now on my network.  We are running 5.0.0.1.  I'll upgrade in
a couple days and see if that also fixes the problem that I'm seeing.  I'm
still only seeing it where we have a mix of 2.4 only APs and AP 125's.  

Greg Williams
IT Security Principal
University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ethan Sommer
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 12:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Band Steering?

FWIW:

After upgrading to 5.0.2 from 5.0.0, things fall back to 2.4ghz much better
than they used to. I think we still need to do some tweeking to get things
working as well as we'd like.

Unfortunately, we don't have the kind of budget to just throw out more APs
to fix the problem, so that's not really an answer for us.

I have to say, I've been really disappointed by Aruba tech support's answer
to this sort of thing.

1. The documentation for 5.0.x says to turn on "Local probe response" 
but that doesn't seem to exist anymore in 5.0, but did in 3.x.
2. In two separate tech support tickets, with two separate tech support
people, I was told that "that was just the way the system worked, people
couldn't fail back to 2.4ghz." That's A) false, and B) not even what the
user manual says.
3. They clearly didn't know that there was (apparently) a bug in 5.0.0 that
was fixed by 5.0.2 which allowed clients to fail back more.

Ethan



On 08/16/2010 06:36 AM, Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) wrote:
> Here is a response I received from Aruba Engineering:
>
> Bruce,
>
> I have heard this from some of my other customers as well. The basic issue
comes down to the physical properties of the 5GHz wave vs. the 2.4GHz. The
lower frequency (2.4) will be able to travel through air and walls and even
"bend" around corners better than the higher frequency 5GHz wave. For this
reason  at the edge of an AP's coverage area the 2.4 signal will be better
quality than the 5GHz. With band-steering enabled we will keep the client on
the 5GHz radio despite a better performing 2.4 signal being available.
>
> I would prefer to keep band steering enabled and design the RF coverage
based on the 5GHz coverage.
>
> You can add an AP 105 and set the b/g radio as a full time air monitor or
you can consider a single radio AP (the AP-93) to provide 5GHz coverage only
to these areas where the 2.4GHz can reach but the 5GHz does not.
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> Bruce Osborne
> Liberty University
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ethan Sommer [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:30 PM
> Subject: Band Steering?
>
> We are upgrading part of our network using Aruba AP-105s and a pair of
> 3600 controllers.
>
> We've found an annoying problem when we have band steering turned on.
>
> We've create two SSIDs. Lets call them BandSteering and NoBandSteering.
> When users are relatively close to an access point, they can connect to
either. My MacBook will usually connect using 2.4 Ghz on NoBandSteering and
will always connect using 5ghz to BandSteering.  When a user is further away
from the access point, however, they can connect fine to NoBandSteering
(obviously it is slower than when they were closer) but can't connect at all
to the BandSteering SSID. It doesn't fail back to 2.4ghz, and the clients
don't recognize that they can't connect and connect to NoBandSteering if
that's lower in their preferred networks list.
>
> The effect is that, understandably, users will select the 
> NoBandSteering SSID because it is more reliable. (Even though it is 
> slower in most cases.)
>
> Aruba suggested that I try setting the 5ghz ARM profile to always max out
the 5ghz radio, which helps some but does not eliminate the areas where
2.4ghz works and 5ghz doesn't.
>
> So, my questions are:
> 1. Are people using band steering?
> 2. Have you found the same problem?
> 3. Is there a way to fix it? (Other than turning off bandsteering.)
>
>
> 4. I suppose a related question is, is there a way to make client
computers prefer 5ghz more?
>
> I guess we'll probably just not use band steering if we can't find a
solution, but it would be a shame not to better utilize the 5ghz spectrum
better.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions!
>
> Ethan
>
> --
> Ethan Sommer
> Associate Director of Core Services
> Gustavus Technology Services
> [email protected]
> 507-933-7042
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>    


--
Ethan Sommer
Associate Director of Core Services
Gustavus Technology Services
[email protected]
507-933-7042

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to