Did you end up using Xirrus in your low density locations as well? ~Patrick
On Oct 4, 2010, at 12:03 PM, "Clark, Joseph K" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We recently, within 2 years, went through a similar test. We included AeroHive and Xirrus in our list along with Meru, Cisco and Aruba. We ended up choosing Xirrus and we have been happy with the decision. If you would like more information let me know. Thanks, Joseph Clark Senior Network Engineer Department of IT College of Charleston Charleston, SC 29424-0001 o:843.953.3846 c:843.425.4291 e:[email protected] From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Huels, Chris Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:35 PM To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Bakeoff All, Currently Washington University uses Meru for wireless. In order to migrate to 802.11n, we will have to replace all of the access points and look at replacing the controllers to accommodate the throughput. This has given us the opportunity to go back and assess other vendors that offer enterprise wireless solutions. The vendors that we are looking into are Meru, Aruba, and Cisco. I would like to get input from this group on some pros and cons of each, or are there other vendors that have been working well? Any input would be helpful. Thanks Chris ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at <http://www.educause.edu/groups/> http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
