|
I've been using 4 channels in the 2.4GHz for years. I've seen and
tested heavily when we first switched to that idea, but since then
I've more advanced RF technologies and other research that has shown
that 1, 6, 11, and 1 in the same area is better than 4 unique
channels. I've been doing RF since 1997 and have had lots of field experience trying lots of combinations like this. I'd glad discuss further, but for a more detailed conversation a phone call might be better. Cisco has released a third party guide stating this same topic and it's supposed to be a non-Cisco document but it certainly has some marketing in it as well. Lee H Badman wrote:
--
**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
|
- 4-channels in 2.4 GHz Lee H Badman
- RE: 4-channels in 2.4 GHz Kellogg, Brian D.
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 GHz Pete Hoffswell
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 GHz Scott Smith
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 GHz Hanset, Philippe C
- RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 GHz John Kaftan
- RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 GHz David Gillett
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 GHz Coehoorn, Joel
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 GHz Hanset, Philippe C
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 G... Coehoorn, Joel
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in ... Ron Walczak
- RE: 4-channels in 2.4 GHz Kellogg, Brian D.
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 GHz Karl Reuss
- Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 4-channels in 2.4 GHz David J Molta

