My concern is that certain fields appear to contain dynamic information like 
the software version (see "srcvers=120.2) and other information (what does 
"35CF2488F02660B1" mean ?).

The only way it seems to collect this information is to connect the device to 
local net, run Bonjour Browser or run "dns-sd –Z" command on a MAC and copy and 
paste results into your DNS configs.

If certain data is dynamic then, you are out of luck.

-Neil

--
Neil Johnson
Network Engineer
The University of Iowa
Phone: 319 384-0938
Fax: 319 335-2951
Mobile: 319 540-2081
E-Mail: neil-john...@uiowa.edu


From: Joel Coehoorn <jcoeho...@york.edu<mailto:jcoeho...@york.edu>>
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:22 PM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Apple Petition

If those entries work, and are all that is needed, then we're not far from full 
support. It seems like we could get a tool or set of scripts to automate 
creating/modifying the needed records.

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 10, 2012, at 7:11 PM, "Johnson, Neil M" 
<neil-john...@uiowa.edu<mailto:neil-john...@uiowa.edu>> wrote:

We looked into DNS-SD,   but with entries like this (example taken from an 
earlier e-mail from Oscar Silva at the Univ. or Texas , and confirmed by our 
own testing):


_airplay._tcp                  PTR     utnet-appletv._airplay._tcp



utnet-appletv._airplay._tcp SRV 0 0 7000 
utnet-appletv.bonjour.utexas.edu<http://utnet-appletv.bonjour.utexas.edu>. ; 
Replace with unicast FQDN of target host

utnet-appletv._airplay._tcp TXT "deviceid=28:E7:CF:DB:6E:E0" "features=0x39f7" 
"model=AppleTV2,1" "pw=1" "srcvers=120.2"



_raop._tcp                PTR     
28E7CFDB6EE0@utnet-appletv._raop._tcp<mailto:28E7CFDB6EE0@utnet-appletv._raop._tcp>



28E7CFDB6EE0@utnet-appletv._raop._tcp<mailto:28E7CFDB6EE0@utnet-appletv._raop._tcp>
 SRV 0 0 49152 
utnet-appletv.bonjour.utexas.edu<http://utnet-appletv.bonjour.utexas.edu>. ; 
Replace with unicast FQDN of target host

28E7CFDB6EE0@utnet-appletv._raop._tcp<mailto:28E7CFDB6EE0@utnet-appletv._raop._tcp>
 TXT "txtvers=1" "ch=2" "cn=0,1,2,3" "da=true" "et=0,3" "md=0,1,2" "pw=true" 
"sv=false" "sr=44100" "ss=16" "tp=UDP" "vn=65537" "vs=120.2" "am=AppleTV2,1" 
"sf=0x4"



_appletv-v2._tcp          PTR     35CF2488F02660B1._appletv-v2._tcp

35CF2488F02660B1._appletv-v2._tcp       SRV     0 0 3689 utnet-

appletv.bonjour.utexas.edu<http://appletv.bonjour.utexas.edu>. ; Replace with 
unicast FQDN of target host


35CF2488F02660B1._appletv-v2._tcp TXT "txtvers=1" 
"hG=00000000-06f6-4f5d-0171-0bcc51d34d14" "MniT=167845888" "fs=2" 
"Name=utnet-appletv" "PrVs=65538" "DFID=2" "EiTS=1" "MiTPV=196611"



_sleep-proxy._udp PTR     70-35-60-63\032utnet-appletv._sleep-proxy._udp



70-35-60-63\032utnet-appletv._sleep-proxy._udp SRV 0 0 55597 
utnet-appletv.bonjour.utexas.edu<http://utnet-appletv.bonjour.utexas.edu>. ; 
Replace with unicast FQDN of target host

70-35-60-63\032utnet-appletv._sleep-proxy._udp  TXT     ""



required for every Apple TV  (and no direction from Apple on what 
entries/fields are actually required) our DNS admins  were ready with pitch 
forks and torches if we attempted saddle them with the the responsibility of 
trying to maintain records for 100's such devices (not to mention printers, 
etc.).

-Neil

--
Neil Johnson
Network Engineer
The University of Iowa
Phone: 319 384-0938
Fax: 319 335-2951
Mobile: 319 540-2081
E-Mail: neil-john...@uiowa.edu<mailto:neil-john...@uiowa.edu>


From: Garry Peirce <pei...@maine.edu<mailto:pei...@maine.edu>>
Reply-To: "pei...@maine.edu<mailto:pei...@maine.edu>" 
<pei...@maine.edu<mailto:pei...@maine.edu>>
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:15 AM
To: 
"WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>" 
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Apple Petition

I’m in support of the collective request to help enable further operational 
flexibility, although also not sure Apple will feel enough pressure to assist.

To the first item:  ‘That Apple establish a way for  Apple TV's (and other 
Bonjour/Airplay enabled devices) be accessible across multiple IPv4 and IPv6 
sub-nets.”
Isn’t this item solved to a degree by wide area DNS-SD?
If not, I assume this is left open to solve by either making it use a routable 
mcast addr or by creating some non-standard solution.

Controls will be needed to make sense of all the advertised services and 
possibly for security/privacy reasons.
I would think navigating a large Bonjour enabled subnet for a production 
service must be an ugly exercise - nevermind if enabled to pass L2 boundaries.
Who remembers those IPX service filtering ACLs?  Request #2 might soon follow 
to network vendors to be able to support Bonjour service filtering.

For production services, wide area DNS-SD seems a better tool to me, as opposed 
to using the wild west of zeroconf end device advertisements or some special 
hardware solution.  We’ve trialed it (static entries) for printing and it seems 
to work well.
This leverages our existing DNS infrastructure, allows for control of the 
advertised entries, and a uniform naming convention making it easier to 
identify the service.
One could also opt to block 224.0.0.251 altogether, if there is concern about 
unnecessary device traffic.

So in tandem to supporting this request, I’d also be interested in anyone’s 
recap of their wide area DNS-SD (WAB) environment, the services being 
advertised , how it is scaling, and any major stumbling blocks.


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 4:00 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Apple Petition

Please consider this- as we get to the point where we have an agreed on 
document, say by this Friday, and we find an online petition site to use where 
individuals can "sign" on in whatever form that takes before we close the 
signing window and present it to Apple- are each one of us able to do so on 
behalf of our institutions or organizations? If you need to seek permission, 
now is the time. If a CIO or Director is the only one allowed to make such 
public-facing declarations on behalf of your school/or org, it would be good to 
start working the notion. Ideally, no one would overstep their position by 
jumping on this worthy endeavor.

Lee H. Badman
Wireless Architect/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Adjunct Instructor, iSchool
Syracuse University
315 443-3003


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]<mailto:[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]>On
 Behalf Of Andy Voelker
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 12:44 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Apple Petition

That confuses me as well.  It is obviously built in to many other iOS devices 
(iPod Touch, iPad) and has been for some time.  Why the change?  I suspect it 
just due to the GUI difference.  If so, that’s easily fixable.

-- Andy Voelker
Manager of Student Computing in the Technology Commons
WCU Staff Senator
Western Carolina University
Check the status of your IT requests at any time at http://help.wcu.edu/ !

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]<mailto:[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]>On
 Behalf Of Voll, Toivo
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 1:28 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Apple Petition

Also, for me, the lack of support for WPA2-Enterprise is a head-scratcher. If 
they go through the trouble of supporting the rest of the encryption schemes, 
and obviously support it on a bunch of their other products, why randomly leave 
it out of some products? I’d prioritize that a bit more, personally.

--
Toivo Voll
Network Engineer
Information Technology Communications
University of South Florida


********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to