Hi Jimmy,


Thanks for the information, certainly quite helpful.



The majority of our area's are 40-100m(distance in directions not space) of 
outdoor lawn space(square, rectangle, circle triangle &other), it's been omni 
for external mounts and patch for heritage buildings with internal mounts. But 
we are more and more thinking patch for all unless omni has an advantage rather 
than the other way around. We have some other cases coming up like Orchid's, 
shearing sheds and farmland but so far nothing planned for more than 180m. It's 
all for general use and teaching.



Might start looking at the Cisco patch, they didn't exist when we first looked 
into it but that was a while ago now.



Out of interest what distance are you get with the 802.11b installs?



Regards


Jason



--

Jason Cook

Technology Services

The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005

Ph    : +61 8 8313 4800



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Helzerman
Sent: Wednesday, 24 July 2013 11:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] External Antenna Choices - Omni vs Patch



Hi.  We use external antennas for unique deployments on campus.  We try to 
stick with the integrated antennas as much as possible to save cost but we know 
that this setup is not for all situations.  With the Cisco 3600 series AP, we 
have deployed them using the Cisco 180 patch which is similar to the Terrawave. 
 Primarily these have been used in our sport venues to cover entrance gates for 
ticket scanners.  The one thing I would look out for is how far you intend to 
have the directional antenna reach.  If the clients are using low-powered omni 
antennas they might not be able to transmit as far as the directional antenna 
and higher power that you are using on the AP.  If you are talking about using 
the directional antennas for a Point-to-Point link then this is not a problem.  
Our goal with external antennas is similar to yours, we want to keep the 
outside signal for outside devices and the inside signal for inside devices.  
In the ticket gate scenario that we use directional antennas at, we have to 
utilize 802.11b rates to get the distance / performance from the end devices 
needed.  Our mounting assets for access points are not close enough to the 
gates and the end devices dont have a high power setting to enable 802.11g or 
802.11a.



-Jimmy



--

James Helzerman
University of Michigan



On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Jason Cook 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi All,



Just wondering what people have done with external antenna's?



The question I have is primarily around whether or not to use 360 degree Omni 
or 180 degree patch antenna's on the outside of a building. We have been 
recommended to use 360's in most cases, even though these put coverage back 
into building where we deploy internal coverage. It seems to me that this could 
cause issues with RF interference, and end up with turning the power down on 
external antenna potentially reducing coverage quality outside.  While a 180 
will  direct the coverage where intended, leaving internals to do their 
intended job and externals to do theirs.



We are using Cisco 3602e's with TerraWave.



Regards


Jason



--

Jason Cook

Technology Services

The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005

Ph    : +61 8 8313 4800

e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



CRICOS Provider Number 00123M

-----------------------------------------------------------

This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains 
information which may be confidential and/or copyright.  If you are not the 
intended recipient please do not read, save, forward, disclose, or copy the 
contents of this email. If this email has been sent to you in error, please 
notify the sender by reply email and delete this email and any copies or links 
to this email completely and immediately from your system.  No representation 
is made that this email is free of viruses.  Virus scanning is recommended and 
is the responsibility of the recipient.



********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.







--

James Helzerman
Wireless Network Engineer
University of Michigan - ITS Communications Systems and Data Centers

Phone: 734-615-9541

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to