I stopped using RLDP 5 years ago. It caused problems with client traffic and many false rogue messages. I use rogue detectors.
Jeff Legge Network Services Radford University (540)-831-7727 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Albano Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] RLDP Feature? We don't use RLDP, mostly b/c "open" Rogues are extremely rare (in our environment). With default settings these days being PSK on SOHO devices, a wide-open Rogue is not common. Mike Albano On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Curtis K. Larsen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I agree. But for a short term solution to bridge the gap until we install the dedicated AP's - I think toggling RLDP on/off for Local mode AP's at scheduled intervals after hours might be a decent option. ________________________________________ From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf of McClintic, Thomas [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 4:09 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] RLDP Feature? I would rather use Rogue Detector APs. We have RLDP enabled here, we are working toward incorporating Rogue Detector APs instead. RLDP only works on open SSIDs and impacts valid client performance. Rogue Detectors can sense secured networks for wired rogues. We do not currently use any real-time voice applications. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Curtis K. Larsen Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:18 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] RLDP Feature? For those running Cisco I am wondering how many of you have the RLDP feature enabled on your controllers, and if you support real-time voice applications like Vocera - have you noticed any affect to their performance, and connectivity? I am looking at enabling the feature with alerting only -no auto-containment just yet- in order to gain a bit more detailed info regarding the rogues in our environment. From the Cisco document here: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/4400-series-wireless-lan-controllers/112045-handling-rogue-cuwn-00.html&k=yYSsEqip9%2FcIjLHUhVwIqA%3D%3D%0A&r=eHsexY0U6WY24UhDK4eLQbvXOPzMySRoCq87DX3WV5M%3D%0A&m=aDJhT1HU4F117G6%2FqtTBpf%2Ff1OnxjfwA4WSf6G1KC%2BU%3D%0A&s=4a01be1a611d0300de7f7e638438a274101d03538be6fd449acad9dc97789836 ...It says "During the RLDP process, the AP is unable to serve clients. This will negatively impact performance and connectivity for local mode APs." Interested to know your experience if any with this. Thanks, Curtis Larsen University of Utah ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.educause.edu/groups/&k=yYSsEqip9%2FcIjLHUhVwIqA%3D%3D%0A&r=eHsexY0U6WY24UhDK4eLQbvXOPzMySRoCq87DX3WV5M%3D%0A&m=aDJhT1HU4F117G6%2FqtTBpf%2Ff1OnxjfwA4WSf6G1KC%2BU%3D%0A&s=06047f242b1b04bf8c6c1583f82c4f3b6c0968bd3e31d2aed0ccd79c6b115542. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
