Some campus networks are larger than service providers, and sometimes even look like a service provider network.
While the allocation and RFC have service providers as the intended target, I'm not aware of anything that would preclude it's use for institutional CGN, especially in residential-like/dormitory settings. The key point is here: Devices MUST be capable of performing address translation when identical Shared Address Space ranges are used on two different interfaces. Frank From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Chan Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 7:53 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] RFC6598 Greetings, RFC 6598 describes an allocation of internal 100.64.0.0/10 address block to be used between CGN and CPE in Server Provider network. The intention of this is to avoid networks overlapping on CPE devices when both CGN and CPE are using RFC 1918. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6598 For those running CGN on wireless, I can see this particularly useful for your clients who use corporate VPN access. Is there anyone using 100.64.0.0/10 for their wireless devices? Any comments would be much appreciated. Thanks, Jason -- Jason Chan Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions, Information + Technology Services University of Toronto Phone: (416)946-5233 Email: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
