We recently had a similar complaint and our Health and Safety Department came 
up with a good write up I thought, tying in the fact that our APs are FCC 
compliant and sourcing other sites such as OSHA, WHO and FDA.


Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA):
OSHA maintains information relative to radiofrequency via its web-site: 
https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/radiofrequencyradiation/.  There are no specific OSHA 
standards with regard to radio frequency or microwave radiation.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Office of Engineering and 
Technology (OET). 
Evaluates the effect of emissions from FCC-regulated transmitters on the 
quality of the human environment. At the present time there is no 
federally-mandated radio frequency (RF) exposure standard, however devices must 
be tested and registered as FCC compliant.
The FCC maintains information on its web-site:  
http://transition.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/rf-faqs.html
Since 1996 the FCC  has required that all wireless communications devices sold 
in the United States meet its minimum guidelines for safe human exposure to 
radiofrequency (RF) energy.
The FCC’s guidelines and rules regarding RF exposure are based upon standards 
developed by IEEE and NCRP and input from other federal agencies (like OSHA and 
EPA).
All wireless devices sold in the US go through a formal FCC approval process to 
ensure that they do not exceed the maximum allowable SAR level when operating 
at the device’s highest possible power level.

The World Health Organization (WHO):
WHO is the directing and coordinating authority for health within the United 
Nations system. It is responsible for providing leadership on global health 
matters, shaping the health research agenda, setting norms and standards, 
articulating evidence-based policy options, providing technical support to 
countries and monitoring and assessing health trends.
Fact Sheet on Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health:   
http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs304/en/
From the WHO Fact Sheet:
"A common concern about base station and local wireless network antennas 
relates to the possible long-term health effects that whole-body exposure to 
the RF signals may have. To date, the only health effect from RF fields 
identified in scientific reviews has been related to an increase in body 
temperature (> 1 °C) from exposure at very high field intensity found only in 
certain industrial facilities, such as RF heaters. The levels of RF exposure 
from base stations and wireless networks are so low that the temperature 
increases are insignificant and do not affect human health."

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) information page on radiation emitting 
products:
http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationEmittingProductsandProcedures/HomeBusinessandEntertainment/CellPhones/default.htm

Chris Chamberlain
Associate Director Network Engineering
Oakland University



On Apr 9, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Gogan, James P <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, it's that time of year again, wherein we get the following contact from 
> one faculty member or staff member (out of tens of thousands of students, 
> faculty and staff):
>  
> " I am an adjunct faculty member and I would like to have a meeting with 
> someone that is charge of the WiFi system on the UNC-CH campus. I believe 
> that there is a significant health risk to all students and faculty around 
> this type of radiation. I would like the opportunity to bring solid research 
> and professionals before you to present the materials.  This cannot be 
> ignored. The liability is too great to all of the students and faculty."
>  
> And just like folks that come up with "scientific studies" that there's no 
> climate change and the Earth is 7,000 years old, of course he has research 
> links to back his claims.
>  
> Before I go digging out what studies and replies we've used in past years 
> when this has come up, I was wondering (a) how many of you also have to deal 
> with this and (b) has there been anything more recent in terms of research we 
> can point to than what I dug up years ago?
>  
> Thanks in advance
>  
> -- Jim Gogan / ITS Comm Tech
>     Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
>  
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to